• restingOface@quokk.au
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    4 days ago

    I think the message that this is trying to boil down to is “Something made by AI is not always inherently worse than something made by a human.” Because a human is technically capable of making a sloppy piece with a 3D pen while a machine is technically capable of making a precise piece.

    But I would argue that a 3D printer does not involve any artificial intelligence. A person created the original 3D model, and then an algorithm is instructing the printer how to reproduce that model. But an algorithm is not intelligence.

    • Addv4@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 days ago

      Unfortunately, its beginning to be a little more complicated than that, as there are prints that can be generated by AI now. Also, some software that detects print issues is probably using AI based tangle detection (pretty it actually is more AI based than just ML, but if anyone knows better let me know). The irony is that this is becoming a pretty good shit post due to that new difference.

      • daannii@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        14 hours ago

        You realize it’s just stolen free 3d models that are slightly altered and smoothed so they look like blobs. ?

        Have you actually pulled up the meshes of ai 3d models. ?

        I suggest giving that a try.

        Ai is just theft. It can’t be better than a human. It can only steal from humans and slightly alter so it looks new when in fact it’s just mashing two things together. Two things made by humans.

        If you have ever done 3d modeling yourself you will understand how absurd it is to believe an AI could do anything of quality.