The Israeli case provides the best forensically documented example of this. Lavender, which created lists of targets for Israeli strikes in Gaza, was not a rogue program. It was officially approved, and officers were given the right to kill up to twenty civilians per junior Hamas operative the system flagged. The approval processes were cut down to a few seconds of rubber-stamping, according to 972 Magazine. The humans “in the loop” were simply laundering algorithmic decisions with a veneer of authorization.
Also notable here is the diffusion of this paradigm to client states. The literature on AI warfare focuses disproportionately on the competition between the U.S. and China. What it conceals is the way U.S. and NATO AI doctrine, and its underlying assumptions regarding acceptable civilian casualties, is exported to allied militaries under Foreign Military Sales agreements without the ethical supervision framework that purportedly limits it in the home country.


“a herd” which disperses, & some of the animals in it form “a small herd”, others form “a bigger herd”…
& some other animals join the bigger herd…
Is that bigger-herd the “original” herd?
Herds & corporations both dissipate negating accountability.
Consequences can only be inescapable for the individual-life or individual-continuum.
That was my point.
_ /\ _