• melroy@kbin.melroy.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Apt packages used to get more updates in the past. Especially ubuntu repos. Today everything just seems to rely on Debian. Which is always lacking behind.

      I don’t like it either. Especially for gaming you really want the latest improvements. Or for science workloads. Or other professionals.

      • geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        The problem is that there’s so many different ways of packaging and also that Windows generally does static linking so old binaries work after a decade. Whereas old Linux binaries are generally dynamically linked and are dependent on some other old library which isn’t availible for [current kernel] and you get into dependency hell

      • vegetaaaaaaa@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 hours ago

        This is fine as long as upstream supports a convenient way to get the latest versions of software for which you actually need latest (APT repositories)

        Stable base, only explicitly allow selected unstable/bleeding edge components.

        This is what I do for ROCm and a few other things which need to be constantly updated (yt-dlp). Sometimes stable-backports repositories are enough, but not always.