• 73ms@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    13 hours ago

    We shouldn’t really look towards the “might is right” geopolitics of the past for how things should be anymore. After WW2 there has been the ideal of a rules based international order under which the people have a right of self-determination and the country has sovereignty which together pretty much means recognizing that the state of Israel does have a right to exist.

    • merc@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 hours ago

      People’s right to self-determination stops when that self-determination results in genocide against other people.

    • Zombie@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Does that preclude Palestine’s right to exist though? Palestinian peoples’ sovereignty?

      Because currently Israel appears to be doing everything in its power to prevent that.

      If they can determine another nation doesn’t have the right to exist, using Might Is Right, why should the rest of the world accept their right to exist?

      • 73ms@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        12 hours ago

        it certainly doesn’t and attempts to resolve this have been happening under the international framework where both things are recognized for many decades now… If we had a system that was able to enforce the ideas uniformly instead of the current deeply flawed one where great powers still hold veto over any issue they want it could be that Israel would be prevented from doing that.