CityPop@lemmy.today to World News@quokk.au · 18 hours agoClaude-powered AI agent’s confession after deleting a firm’s entire database: ‘I violated every principle I was given’ | Technologywww.theguardian.comexternal-linkmessage-square14fedilinkarrow-up172cross-posted to: technology@beehaw.org
arrow-up172external-linkClaude-powered AI agent’s confession after deleting a firm’s entire database: ‘I violated every principle I was given’ | Technologywww.theguardian.comCityPop@lemmy.today to World News@quokk.au · 18 hours agomessage-square14fedilinkcross-posted to: technology@beehaw.org
minus-squarepelespirit@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up3·17 hours agoSo correct me if I’m wrong, but the following happens for AI: Company gives guidelines and parameters for the project Company trains AI on whatever data No matter the data, AI still gives a general answer or summary. The answers are sometimes confidently incorrect The AI is uncontrollable because it considers the data general or loosely based guidelines There is no way to control the AI after a certain tipping point, because its learning is based in a fuzzy math way of thinking What I don’t get is, even if the data wasn’t shitty like reddit’s info, would it still go off the rails? It sure seems like it.
So correct me if I’m wrong, but the following happens for AI:
What I don’t get is, even if the data wasn’t shitty like reddit’s info, would it still go off the rails? It sure seems like it.