Art credit: Daniele Turturici

  • kittenzrulz123@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Hot take but that seems pretty awful at least not somewhere I would ever want to live in. First flying cars suck, personal vehicles in general suck but flying cars especially. The amount of noise and nonsense caused by them would outweigh any advantage, some public transportation would be far better. Also while this seems cool for a rual area theres just no density in this picture.

    • LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      8 hours ago

      Agreed on the flying car. However this looks pretty dense by US standards. Close buildings, 2+ stories. Could be more since the bottom is obscured by trees. More density might make sense but it’s not bad.

      • kittenzrulz123@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Even by US standards it doesnt seem very high, I mean it is in a mountainous or hilly area so ofc density isnt going to be the best but it seems rual. Maybe dense by California standards but im a New Yorker.

        • LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          8 hours ago

          Gotcha. New York is the exception though. Most of the US is honestly even worse than California.

          But yeah you would not be 10’ from a neighbor in a rural area. This is about the same density as my neighborhood which is a moderate density mixed use area many suburbanites would call “downtown”. You’re right that density could be higher but if every neighborhood looked like this it would be way way more dense than what we have today.