If a political system yields worse candidates, why then should one support a system that still causes damage‽ Why are you blaming a voter for being responsible for harm reduction, when the system still creates damage?
I’m still struggling to understand what you’re trying to say. What damage? I was just advocating for voting for the less shit candidate while you are working towards whatever else.
It’s not one or the other, you can still vote to try and minimize damage while working towards or dreaming about revolution.
Good sir, WHAT DAMAGE‽
Some candidates are worse than others. You’d preferably would want the less shit one to win
If a political system yields worse candidates, why then should one support a system that still causes damage‽ Why are you blaming a voter for being responsible for harm reduction, when the system still creates damage?
I’m struggling to understand your point. Are you asking why you should vote for the less shitty candidate?
Wait, you don’t comprehend your own political system?
We don’t use First Past The Post. Where did you assume I was from and why…?
Now that I read your bio
What kind of damage is Finland producing that you felt the need to reply in an anarchist community?
I’m still struggling to understand what you’re trying to say. What damage? I was just advocating for voting for the less shit candidate while you are working towards whatever else.