• artyom@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    I mean that’s just a super rare choice of TVs that very few people are actually going to be using.

    • juipeltje@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      Why are you so against this? Just because it’s a smaller group of people that needs this feature it’s not worth implementing, and the people that need it can just suck a fat one? Also, assuming technology keeps advancing, wanting more than 4k60 output isn’t going to be a rare request as time moves on.

      • artyom@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        I’m not against it at all. It just seems super unimportant.

        When I got a “TV” I just got one with DP, personally.

        • juipeltje@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          24 hours ago

          I’ve never even seen a tv with dp before lol, nevermind one with the specs i’m after. Although tbf i’m not that informed about the tv market. I only payed attention to it when i wanted one for the desk.

          • artyom@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            24 hours ago

            Well I put “TV” in quotes because I don’t know exactly what the difference is. The 2 devices have distinct general features but they’re not strict. Mine is a 48" OLED.

    • velxundussa@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Take of that what you will, but I have the same specs/requirements as that other person.

      I don’t think it’s as rare as you assume: couch gaming PCs are a thing, and expecting similar compatibility as consoles is normal.