• Cocodapuf@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    edit-2
    4 hours ago

    Wait a second… how can they enforce this legislation when a VPN is masking the user’s location? How do they know a user using a VPN is from Utah?

    Correct me if I’m wrong here, but aren’t the users they’re trying to regulate the exact subsection of users that they don’t have the ability to identify as being citizens of Utah?

    Like if a user appears to be in Utah, then they’re probably not using a vpn. And if the user appears to be from out of state, then they could be using a vpn, but also Utah law doesn’t apply to those people because they’re not from Utah (as far as they know)… So essentially this law can’t actually apply to… anyone?

    • Jason2357@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 hours ago

      You are too generous. If a company registered in Utah has a user who is coming in via VPN, then that user could be from Utah and the company is not in compliance unless they enforce age verification and thus liable. Thus, everyone has to hand over their ID. No one cares if a NY resident or European or whatever gets caught in it too. That’s not a requirement to avoid.

      • Alaik@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 hour ago

        Albeit I haven’t checked 100% of my traffic but thank God nothing important is hosted in Utah.

        • Jason2357@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          33 minutes ago

          I don’t know about this one, but these laws usually apply to any company doing commerce inside the jurisdiction. So any company with an office or other business presence there, not just hosting.