Lee Duna@lemmy.nz to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 7 hours agoGo Away Microsoft! The Netherlands is Quietly Building Its Own GitHub Replacementitsfoss.comexternal-linkmessage-square62fedilinkarrow-up1569
arrow-up1569external-linkGo Away Microsoft! The Netherlands is Quietly Building Its Own GitHub Replacementitsfoss.comLee Duna@lemmy.nz to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 7 hours agomessage-square62fedilink
minus-squareneukenindekeuken@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9·5 hours agoSure, at the very beginning of the launch of Git, Mercurial was better/had more features/more mature/etc. That’s just not true after 20 years of mainstream git adoption and development today.
minus-squareCactusEcho@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·4 hours agoMercurial is also simpler than Git and the commands are more intuitive
minus-squarerezifon@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·4 hours agoNeither of those observations, even if true, are an incentive for someone to migrate away from git.
minus-squareCactusEcho@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 hour agoThey are true (I bet you never used mercurial) and you must learn how to read: Where did I wrote to migrate from Git to mercurial? Having alternatives is good
Sure, at the very beginning of the launch of Git, Mercurial was better/had more features/more mature/etc.
That’s just not true after 20 years of mainstream git adoption and development today.
Mercurial is also simpler than Git and the commands are more intuitive
Neither of those observations, even if true, are an incentive for someone to migrate away from git.
They are true (I bet you never used mercurial) and you must learn how to read: Where did I wrote to migrate from Git to mercurial? Having alternatives is good