• HexagonSun@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 days ago

    I both love and hate mine. The fundamental sound quality, size, weight and aesthetic is great. And I love an interface that means album artwork doesn’t matter.

    Being a universal USB C DAC is great.

    But the software quality control is horrendous. Every update introduces a new bug, you can’t update without wiping all your settings, and some albums won’t show the tracks in the right order no matter what I try.

    • orb360@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      Tracks are ordered by creation or modified timestamp iirc. There’s a script you can use that will go through your file list and update the timestamps based on filename order so they match.

      (Thats the stupidest thing to sort on tho, idk why they did that)

      • HexagonSun@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Oh wow. So that’s what it’s doing. I could see it was ignoring most metadata that other software would use, but never thought of that.

        Great to have an answer, but a shame it’s such an incredibly stupid one!

        Edit: With the help of a python script made by Claude I’ve made things better.

        But even now that things are ordered correctly many albums ”start” at track 10 and finish with tracks 1-9, so I have to scroll back to go to track 1. Madness.

    • Bilb!@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      We feel the same. It could be so much better than it is. It’s never clear why the order of files is why it is.