Yeah there are a couple .mlers I’ve had conversations with that were genuine and didn’t seem weird. They actually provided a lot of good information about things I wasn’t aware of, specifically some of the things I’ve referenced in this thread.
I’m not anti-communist, as you’ve decided, I’m anti-manipulation. Why don’t you try engaging with the points I’ve made instead of attacking my character, because I won’t be dancing with you on whatever dribble you just put out.
Yeah there are a couple .mlers I’ve had conversations with that were genuine and didn’t seem weird. They actually provided a lot of good information about things I wasn’t aware of, specifically some of the things I’ve referenced in this thread.
Very cool but completely irrelevant to the claim that people on ml can respond to your recycled drivel with well sourced comments quickly and thus are all secretly using ai.
Right, right.
Yeah there are a couple .mlers I’ve had conversations with that were genuine and didn’t seem weird. They actually provided a lot of good information about things I wasn’t aware of, specifically some of the things I’ve referenced in this thread.
I’m not anti-communist, as you’ve decided, I’m anti-manipulation. Why don’t you try engaging with the points I’ve made instead of attacking my character, because I won’t be dancing with you on whatever dribble you just put out.
Very cool but completely irrelevant to the claim that people on ml can respond to your recycled drivel with well sourced comments quickly and thus are all secretly using ai.
You’re doing a great job cosplaying one then.
Yeah ok man, very compelling argument — very astute.
As opposed to your very compelling argument of “your arguments are too good, that’s suspicious!”
That isn’t what I said, at all — but I’ve interacted with you before, I don’t need to explain myself to a literal cave person.
“you’ve disagreed with me before, so that means you’re wrong!”
More compelling than “fast replies to recycled drivel means everyone is using ai”.