agent_nycto@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 3 days agoSBA #119 mathslemmy.worldimagemessage-square98fedilinkarrow-up1217
arrow-up1217imageSBA #119 mathslemmy.worldagent_nycto@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 3 days agomessage-square98fedilink
minus-squareMistic@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up5·edit-21 day agoUsually, no sign before the bracket means juxtaposition. Scientific calculators do account for it (not all, tho), while regular ones may not. So 2(1+2) is really (2+4) Compare 2/2x and 2/2×X where x is (1+2) The first is 2/(2+4)=1/3, the second is (2/2)×(1+2)=3 Basically, either 1 or 9 can be considered correct. And yes, it’s ambiguous. Also, there’s no real rule about solving left to right due to associative and commutative properties: 1×2×3 = 1×(2×3) = (1×2)×3 = 3×1×2 = 2×1×3 = 6
Usually, no sign before the bracket means juxtaposition. Scientific calculators do account for it (not all, tho), while regular ones may not.
So 2(1+2) is really (2+4)
Compare 2/2x and 2/2×X where x is (1+2)
The first is 2/(2+4)=1/3, the second is (2/2)×(1+2)=3
Basically, either 1 or 9 can be considered correct. And yes, it’s ambiguous.
Also, there’s no real rule about solving left to right due to associative and commutative properties: 1×2×3 = 1×(2×3) = (1×2)×3 = 3×1×2 = 2×1×3 = 6