WM: niri

distro: arch BTW

terminal: foot

notification: fnott made by the same developer of foot

web browser: qutebrowser

statusbar: i3bar-river and powered by i3status-rs

I made my own bash script to randomize wallpapers that took me long time to make. If you want to try it out: randwall

My dotfiles are not very organized yet that’s why I haven’t git them for now but I will do soon …

  • userpi@lemmy.mlOP
    0·
    29 days ago

    Mako better than fnott in:

    • better in handling images (thumbnails) than fnott because fnott lags if there’s many notifications with high resolution thumbnails that are displayed at once.
    • It has more anchor positions. you cannot have center-right or top-center anchors in Fnott. Fnott has only 5 anchor positions while Mako has 9.
    • You can restore previous expired notifications with makoctl restore command while fnottctl doesn’t has it.

    Fnott is better than mako in:

    • You have dynamic width so every notification has it is own width instead of all of them have the same width which is the main reason why I use Fnott.
    • Easier to config.
    • jeremyparker@programming.dev
      0·
      26 days ago

      The dynamic width thing is huge… so many notifications spend their precious initial width on boilerplate bs, I’ll give it a shot…

      tho tbh all I really need is a full screen, undismissable thing for when my battery is dying… other notifications are very lovely but the number of times I’ve only realized I was low on battery when my computer starts shutting down is… a lot.