KatherinaReichelt@feddit.org to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 day agoBrowsers Treat Big Sites Differentlydenodell.comexternal-linkmessage-square26fedilinkarrow-up1149cross-posted to: webdev@programming.dev
arrow-up1149external-linkBrowsers Treat Big Sites Differentlydenodell.comKatherinaReichelt@feddit.org to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 day agomessage-square26fedilinkcross-posted to: webdev@programming.dev
minus-squareyoumaynotknow@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·15 hours agoA standard is that, a standard. The amount of moving parts (features?) is irrelevant. Either it’s up to the standard or it isn’t.
minus-squaregroet@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·15 hours agoThen no browser will be “up to” the last 15 years of the standard as none implement all features.
minus-squareyoumaynotknow@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·15 hours agoCorrect. That is why we’re talking about having standards and enforcing them. That’s the whole point.
minus-squaregroet@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·13 hours agoNo the point of this discussion is about having one single yes/no question about the standard or a list of features.
minus-squareyoumaynotknow@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·11 hours agoSo, we’re speaking different languages. Got it.
A standard is that, a standard. The amount of moving parts (features?) is irrelevant.
Either it’s up to the standard or it isn’t.
Then no browser will be “up to” the last 15 years of the standard as none implement all features.
Correct. That is why we’re talking about having standards and enforcing them. That’s the whole point.
No the point of this discussion is about having one single yes/no question about the standard or a list of features.
So, we’re speaking different languages. Got it.