Not really. The people criticising society are doing so because they want to live in a society but a better version of it. The alternative of building another society is monumental.
The people booing AI seem to fundamentally oppose what it has done, what it is doing and what it will do. But they choose to directly support this product through contributing to the user count, funding, data collection, imrpvoement, normalisation. The alternative is them losing next to nothing by ignoring it. They probably even gain by not using ai.
But comment was not about the audience specifically because I’m sure some of them avoid ai. It was directed at the article claiming that young people hate AI and me saying but they use and they do have a very high adoption rate. If I recall its something like 80% use it weekly highest of any age group.
Not really. The people criticising society are doing so because they want to live in a society but a better version of it. The alternative of building another society is monumental.
The people booing AI seem to fundamentally oppose what it has done, what it is doing and what it will do. But they choose to directly support this product through contributing to the user count, funding, data collection, imrpvoement, normalisation. The alternative is them losing next to nothing by ignoring it. They probably even gain by not using ai.
But comment was not about the audience specifically because I’m sure some of them avoid ai. It was directed at the article claiming that young people hate AI and me saying but they use and they do have a very high adoption rate. If I recall its something like 80% use it weekly highest of any age group.