Memdeklaro - Self declaration of identity (https://memdeklaro.org/) empowers people to self-declare their own identity, without third parties, surveillance or censorship. Aiming to present an alternative to the exclusionary state monopoly on identity, Memdeklaro is accessible to everyone, and is a non-government and non-corporate project, similar to Garry Davis’s World Passport and Digitalcourage’s ID with self-chosen data. Memdeklaro’s self declaration generator, ebook, presentation and webpage are in the public domain: https://github.com/memdeklaro

  • luokaton@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 days ago

    I’m totally digging the sentiment, but I struggle to understand the practical aspects. What use is this ID, if realistically no institution is gonna accept it? What’s stopping me from claiming that i’m Marie Skłodowska-Curie? How can I trust that someone presenting me with such an ID is a freedom-loving stateless refugee, and not a criminal faking their identity?

    • luokaton@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Okay, i found a use case 😉 Where I live, you can get anonymous STI testing, and at the reception they identify you by first name and date of birth that you filled out online – but since it’s communicated verbally, everyone in the waiting room can hear.

      That’s where Memdeklaro could come in: they already trust whatever name and DoB you give them verbally, so they might just as well trust a piece of plastic that’s conveniently available in your wallet.

  • recursive_recursion@piefed.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    This seems like a solution looking for a problem.

    How can I or the people around me trust this when it’s licensed under unlicense?

    If governments and companies decide to adopt this I feel like only then will this become a real useful tool.

    As it is currently, it’s an interesting idea that needs a bit more development time on the initial concept or pitch.

    • LurkingLuddite@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Why is no license a red flag? Other than failing to protect future developments from trivial enshittification and takeover, anyways…

      • refalo@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Companies don’t like legally-questionable (in their mind at least) licenses. If you look at the people who use this license, it’s mostly very small personal projects.