• Archangel1313@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Good luck making that stand up in court. They may as well be handing out “get-out-of-jail-free” cards.

    • TheReanuKeeves@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      5 hours ago

      They don’t use it as admissible evidence, they use it to find out whether someone is worth pursuing in legitimate ways that are more time and effort intensive.

      • Archangel1313@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 hours ago

        That type of investigation would still require a warrant or exigent circumstances at the minimum. Otherwise it’s just fishing…which is a violation of Canada’s privacy laws. They can’t just go rooting through someone’s phone looking for a reason to pursue further investigation.

          • Archangel1313@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 hours ago

            Aah. I missed this part on my first reading…

            Once a judge approves surveillance, police have carte blanche on methods.

            This would be used on suspects that they have a warrant to investigate.