Considering I’m shitting on the robots, that only further proves my point that ya’ll are brainless morons merely voting down that which you do not understand. Sad.
My dude, your username is literally “LurkingLuddite” and you’re doing exactly what a luddite that is lurking would do. You might as well be a bot* at that point lol
Given the complexity of the performance, and a clear miscalculation, which it was initially able to recover from, would say you’re not giving it enough credit.
You need to understand… regaining stability on a PERFECTLY FLAT AND PREDICTABLE surface is not new nor novel for robotics.
Oh gosh, you’re absolutely right. That was in no way impressive at all, and I should never have brought it up. Can you ever forgive me?
Your sarcasm only proves how absolutely pathetic you and everyone else’s understanding of robotics is.
Sounds like something a robot would say 🤔
Considering I’m shitting on the robots, that only further proves my point that ya’ll are brainless morons merely voting down that which you do not understand. Sad.
Holy fuck guys we found him. It’s the guy that’s been going around shitting on people’s robots
Say again?
My dude, your username is literally “LurkingLuddite” and you’re doing exactly what a luddite that is lurking would do. You might as well be a bot* at that point lol
Your inability to grasp reality is both pathetic and hilarious
So that’s a “no” on forgiveness?
Given the complexity of the performance, and a clear miscalculation, which it was initially able to recover from, would say you’re not giving it enough credit.
No. It only recovered when it stumbled back into a flat area. That OBVIOUSLY demonstrates that it’s too stupid to deal with dynamic terrain.
Ok, you disrespect it now, but if you put a couple of M-249 saws on its arms, would you respect it then?
No
On two legs? After stumbling? That was impressive few years back on four legs (the robodogs).
To be fair, Spot (which I assume is the kind of robodog you were talking about) is already a decade old