It’s because public transport isn’t always profitable that it needs subsidy, because the indirect effects of a mobile population are extremely beneficial.
Public transport should not be profitable. It should be public . Paying for a public service with money from taxes is not subsidy, it’s a provided public service.
It’s because public transport isn’t always profitable that it needs subsidy, because the indirect effects of a mobile population are extremely beneficial.
Public transport should not be profitable. It should be public . Paying for a public service with money from taxes is not subsidy, it’s a provided public service.
I don’t think you’re really disagreeing with me except on minor matters of terminology.