• Xenny@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Ooof I always maintained that this clause was for other storefronts selling steam keys. If ubisoft was supplying their own download/update architecture without using steam but getting punished anyway then this is a bad look.

    • lordnikon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 minutes ago

      If it was another third party store yeah bad look since it was first party you can see ubisofts start of the enshittification. In the short term drive down the price to drive out all other third party resellers stores.

      Then bam jack up the prices on first party after driving out all the competition. Then its just like streaming instead of 3 library’s you have 24+ and even higher prices. But if there was proof they did this to gog or another third party store then throw the book at them.

      I just wish they would compete on features not so much price. Because while i like paying less for games. I have seen the amazon model of drive out everyone else with price with VC money then jack up the price. When we have less choice.