Seems like he’s been pushed into using LLMs as a way to cope with the deluge of LLM-generated security reports.

  • slacktoid@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    11 hours ago

    I agree with the worry and wanting an alternative but demanding what the dev does is where it crosses a line I feel

    • binux@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      11 hours ago

      I agree with that too, though I think the self-righteous attitude like that of the person I’m replying to swings in the opposite direction a little too hard for my liking. There’s a happy balance, y’know?

      People shouldn’t complain in a dev’s ear like they owe them something they never promised, and people trying to call that out shouldn’t counter it with a demeaningly confrontational demeanour. Obviously that’s a lot to ask for on the internet, but it’s a good thing to try for at least.

      • slacktoid@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Tell me about it, I am skeptical about AI and I kinda wanna know the True Positive, true negative, false positive, false negatives with these AI classified bugs. Still a useful tool.

        I just think it’s unreasonable to ask someone to do dev work for free, either pay or contribute (code, docs, help in misc ways) or cash (and pull out when they do something you don’t approve that’s your right). But until there’s real fuckery let’s just open bug reports and complain about real issues that can be fixed.