• OwOarchist@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    11 hours ago

    it’s practically impossible to comply with this law.

    It’s practically impossible when you’re scraping the whole damn internet with absolutely no regard to any copyrights whatsoever, yes.

    The whole point of this law is to make AI companies stop doing that. To make them stop stealing every copyrighted work they can get their hands on to feed their plagiarism machines.

    (It is possible to train an AI while still respecting copyright. Adobe’s image-generating AI features were trained only on images that are public domain or images Adobe actually owns the rights to.)

    • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Adobe did something ethically?

      BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA

      Sorry

      You were saying that you actually believe that?

    • ghostpony@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Adobe’s image-generating AI features were trained only on images that are public domain or images Adobe actually owns the rights to.

      Absolutely not true. They trained their models on all the work people put up on Adobe Stock, changed the terms of use to be opt-out, and then disseminated the lie they’re they’re doing “ethical AI”. It’s complete bullshit. There’s no way to train generative AI and respect copyright.

      • OwOarchist@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 hours ago

        No, they didn’t do it ethically. But they did to it legally. Which is more than you can say about most AI companies.