- cross-posted to:
- privacy@programming.dev
- cross-posted to:
- privacy@programming.dev
We build free, open-source privacy tools — encrypted chat, anonymous mail, untraceable voice, a whistleblower drop, a browser, a network layer. All given away.
But “free and open source” means nothing if you can’t check it. So:
- Source is public — read every line: github.com/Anon-Gratis
- Hashes are signed — verify the binary matches what we published
- Build it yourself — don’t want our binary? Compile it from source
We don’t want your trust. We want you to not need it. The only privacy tool that survives “trust me bro” is the one you can read.
🌐 anonymous.gratis · ✉️ admin@anon.gratis (PGP on site)
Love the message, but personally I won’t use software written by LLMs.
yep, instant skip
Human vetted. So long as it’s good sound code. I see no issues. Needs to be human expert vetted.
Or it could be written by a human to begin with and not have endless subtle bugs that take greater expertise to find and fix than just writing by hand.
Where are you taking this info from?