Are you implying that they put the vulnerability there? What is even your point? As far as I know they were the first ones to have a fix for that issue but apparently that means that they’re inherently insecure. Like seriously, do you even have any idea what you’re talking about???
I mean… GrapheneOS is here to do exactly the opposite of that. Lol. I mean… Fuck Yoti but like ¯\(ツ)/¯
deleted by creator
I’m not opposed to old school devices but realistically they’re impractical in today’s world.
I used to use flip phones. While cheap, too much of the world expects you to have a smartphone.
deleted by creator
Are you implying that they put the vulnerability there? What is even your point? As far as I know they were the first ones to have a fix for that issue but apparently that means that they’re inherently insecure. Like seriously, do you even have any idea what you’re talking about???
deleted by creator
You are correct I believe. My understanding was that graphene blocked an api or something like that to address the vulnerability…?
deleted by creator
Okay I’m just gonna say it. So what?
deleted by creator
And you have anything other vibes? No. No you do not.
Or are you gonna pull the old “do your own research line” cause you think it makes you sound smart?
I see what you’re saying. I’m partial to Graphene but I am picking up what you’re putting down.