schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de to Stallman Was Right@programming.dev · 6 days agoStarmer gives tech firms ultimatum to block explicit images on children’s phoneswww.theguardian.comexternal-linkmessage-square6fedilinkarrow-up116
arrow-up116external-linkStarmer gives tech firms ultimatum to block explicit images on children’s phoneswww.theguardian.comschnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de to Stallman Was Right@programming.dev · 6 days agomessage-square6fedilink
minus-squareOwOarchist@pawb.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·6 days agoAh, but there still might be explicit text? Better for your ‘fully compliant phone’ to just display nothing whatsoever in ‘kid mode’.
minus-squarepartial_accumen@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·edit-26 days ago Ah, but there still might be explicit text? The regulation calls for zero explicit text filtering compliance. It calls only for blocking explicit images.
minus-squareOwOarchist@pawb.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·6 days ago The regulation calls for zero explicit text filtering compliance. So far…
minus-squarepartial_accumen@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·6 days agoRight, we agree. When and if a further compliance regulation exists, they can build a product to meet that requirement, maliciously or otherwise.
Ah, but there still might be explicit text?
Better for your ‘fully compliant phone’ to just display nothing whatsoever in ‘kid mode’.
The regulation calls for zero explicit text filtering compliance. It calls only for blocking explicit images.
So far…
Right, we agree. When and if a further compliance regulation exists, they can build a product to meet that requirement, maliciously or otherwise.