• DrakeAlbrecht@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    22 hours ago

    Unlike conventional spectrometers, which rely on dispersing light or algorithmic reconstruction to recover spectra, the convolutional spectrometer physically performs a convolution operation on the incoming light. This is achieved using a simple cascade of optical components with periodic spectral responses, such as unbalanced Mach–Zehnder interferometers or micro-ring resonators.

    Is this thing a spectrometer or a fucking turbo encabulator?

    • Hacksaw@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 hours ago

      I literally went onto the comments to post this exact comment about that exact paragraph. Love to see another enjoyer of side fumble prevention.

    • davad@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      22 hours ago

      I’ve worked with spectrometers and on spectrometry design before, and that quote from the article is intelligible. It’s also pretentious and poorly explained.

      • fonix232@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        10 hours ago

        I’ve never worked with spectrometers but physics and chemistry were some of my strongest subjects, so it made some sense to me - but the sentence was definitely written with the intent to say “look peons, I know big science words you do not, and I can string them into a sentence you’ll question the legibility of”.