Meat is worse than AI for the environnement, and you can go without meat (except some health condition)
We can also go without AI. Meat can give nutritional value.
All I’ve seen AI do is reconcentrate wealth to the top 1% of tech bros. LLMs are chat bots that give out information that have to be independently verified.
Palm oil gives nutrients, yet its cultivation pollute. Meat production pollute, and it’s consumption can be reduced or replaced.
All I’ve seen AI do is concentrate wealth to the top 1%tech bros.
I agree. Also consider that meat industry has it’s own big evil shareholder that exploit farmers to produce shit for consumers
My whole point is not ai good meat bad.
Its : if your argument against ai is water, energy and pollution (which i agree with, all this datacenter, hardware and energy consumption is nonsense compared to the little scope of where ai is useful), don’t oppose it to farming industry, or also fight against intensive meat production, which also involves a john shareholder that destroys the planet
absolutely, when people who struggle to write English use it to make an email presentable i tell them stop doing dumb shit
when the person i know who has severe dyslexia uses it to fix his emails from an absolute state of typos and mixed words i tell him, hey man, hikingvet says you’re doing the dumbest shit 😃
Dude, you’re upset because of my opinion. You saying I don’t work in tech is you trying to handwave it thinking I’m not allowed to have an opinion with the information available because “I don’t work in field”.
Stop getting your underwear twisted because I’m using the data available.
It’s a fucking shell game and business insider is a mouth piece for the 1%.
It is has a huge overvaluation.
We don’t need AI everywhere, and using that as an argument is quite short sighted.
You sound like a pissy little child because I said something you don’t like.
We can also go without AI. Meat can give nutritional value.
All I’ve seen AI do is reconcentrate wealth to the top 1% of tech bros. LLMs are chat bots that give out information that have to be independently verified.
Yes
Palm oil gives nutrients, yet its cultivation pollute. Meat production pollute, and it’s consumption can be reduced or replaced.
I agree. Also consider that meat industry has it’s own big evil shareholder that exploit farmers to produce shit for consumers
My whole point is not ai good meat bad.
Its : if your argument against ai is water, energy and pollution (which i agree with, all this datacenter, hardware and energy consumption is nonsense compared to the little scope of where ai is useful), don’t oppose it to farming industry, or also fight against intensive meat production, which also involves a john shareholder that destroys the planet
so you don’t work in tech then
Well, you obviously have a bias towards people doing the dumbest shit possible.
absolutely, when people who struggle to write English use it to make an email presentable i tell them stop doing dumb shit
when the person i know who has severe dyslexia uses it to fix his emails from an absolute state of typos and mixed words i tell him, hey man, hikingvet says you’re doing the dumbest shit 😃
Lol, you seem mad that I don’t have a good opinion of chat bots that tell lies.
any assumptions of ‘mad’ or ‘triggered’ are a mistake on your behalf
i think you have an uneducated opinion and i am simple offering a rebuttal to it
feel free to point out where im wrong (ideally without childish memes)
This is you upset about my opinion.
Anything you have said afterwards is just you stomping your feet, because we didn’t need LLMs to do the things you said they were useful for.
So hey, when you want to “educate” someone, don’t insult their intelligence first.
negative, it is me pointing out that you don’t work in tech
As I do, tech is my life, and AI is EVERYWHERE
https://www.businessinsider.com/anthropic-trillion-dollar-valuation-on-secondary-markets-2026
It ain’t getting a trillion dollar valuation based on things it CAN’T do
Dude, you’re upset because of my opinion. You saying I don’t work in tech is you trying to handwave it thinking I’m not allowed to have an opinion with the information available because “I don’t work in field”.
Stop getting your underwear twisted because I’m using the data available.
It’s a fucking shell game and business insider is a mouth piece for the 1%.
It is has a huge overvaluation.
We don’t need AI everywhere, and using that as an argument is quite short sighted.
You sound like a pissy little child because I said something you don’t like.
Go cry elsewhere.