• ParlimentOfDoom@piefed.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    First, Stopping a monopoly from doing monopolistic things isn’t the same as breaking up the monopoly…

    Holding the biggest player accountable for shitty behavior sets a precedent that you’ll keep the rest from doing it, too.

    Arguing that any other business would do the same thing in defense of this shitty action, doesn’t help anyone.

    • ski11erboi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      Agreed but the issue here is what are the monopolistic things things valve is doing. What’s the shitty behavior we’re trying to hold them accountable for?

      Because if we break up a company for good behavior then we’re setting a precedent that other companies with good practices will be broken up too.

      • ParlimentOfDoom@piefed.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        Literally no one but you has talked about breaking up/destroying the company.

        Price fixing is what these lawsuits are all about. 4 of them now, that I’m aware of.

        That’s the behavior being pushed against here. You’d have known that of you read the article. Or any of the others in the past few months as these come out. You should be against that. But your playing the ignorant just asking questions game as interference for the perpetrator instead.