• mecen@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      7 hours ago

      No buy from gog and show that there is money in being consumer friendly

      • DillDough@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 hours ago

        The Nazi storefront? How about just fuck all corps, either steal it or do the transaction directly with the devs.

    • Strider@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      9 hours ago

      I support skg but also I stopped buying (aaa) games a long time ago, and I can’t be the only one. We’re the people who have enough disposable income but simply won’t support shit but beancounter managers are too stupid to realize it would be easy to get if they’d just show a little decency.

      🤷

      • zqps@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Yeah. There was a statistic about Steam a while ago showing that the percentage of recent releases by playtime was steadily declining. People have their classics, they outgrow competitive games, they don’t want to upgrade their PCs as much with current prices. This was masked for a time by overall steady growth in the gaming sector, but this is slowing down.

    • SteveNashFan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Boycotts don’t work when John Gamer spends hundreds of millions on microtransactions. I could never buy another EA Sports game for the rest of my life, and all it takes is one whale to wipe out ten of me boycotting. The economy of boycotting games is completely broken at scale when whales exist, and companies know how to cater to them.

      • Trail@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        9 hours ago

        But if the whale does not have 10 other people to play with and show off their whaling, then they won’t whale no more on that game.

        You are the plankton accompanying the whale (wtf am I typing while shitting in the morning) even if you are not paying directly, you support the ecosystem. No other players to play with, then suddenly it’s a boring game.

        • jabberwock@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          9 hours ago

          I get your point but look at any harbor in the Mediterranean when an event comes to town, it’s full of super-yatchs. The rich will always be fine peacocking for each other, and yatch builders manage to stay in business just fine. I realize it’s a bit different since there’s a whole social aspect of the game, arguably the whole point is to play with others. I just don’t see the bean counters having that foresight.

          I’d put more weight behind IP law, where if a company chooses to shut down an online game then it gets treated like abandonware and they cannot pursue fans who run their own servers. That does put the onus on the fans at the end of the day, but I think in the long run it would make companies more willing to appeal to a wider audience if we always had an open model to fall back to.

    • atro_city@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      62
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Gamers are less capable of self-control than heroin addicts. Trying to get them to stop buying games is a fools errand.

        • taiyang@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          16 hours ago

          To this day I’ve still failed to talk my stepdad out of buying Madden games… even when they no longer work on Windows 10 (and of course Linux) so he’s having to upgrade… Sigh.

      • MagnificentSteiner@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        7 hours ago

        This is not true. Don’t spread this false “you don’t own your games” narrative.

        You buy a perpetual license for a copy of the game. It’s called a license because you are not buying the actual game but a copy. It’s exactly the same way other software works as well as music and other media.

        The whole point of SKG is that we do own our games but publishers are trying to act otherwise.

        Here, Ross who started SKG explains it better.