• oce 🐆@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    12 hours ago

    Any good rational article explaining why Zelenskyy decided to use that name related to a Polish massacre? My understanding is that he can’t be picky with his allies in times of war so he made some honorific gift to the far-right to keep/get their support.

    • Hacksaw@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Because the unit fought both Nazis and Soviets to try to carve out an independent Ukraine. The attack on the poles wasn’t the “main” thing they did. It was also an insurgency unit not a regular unit so it’s hard to treat them as one thing. The only people who consider it the main thing are the Poles.

      Here is the Polish deputy Science minister on the matter and probably one of the few rational voices in the debate

      It was a unit that — regardless of what you say about the Volhynia massacre — fought for Ukraine’s independence,” Szeptycki said in a radio interview, and compared the UPA to Poland’s anti-communist guerrillas after the end of World War II.

      https://www.politico.eu/article/volodymyr-zelenskyy-poland-world-war-ii-ukrainian-military-unit-polish-politics/

    • Zedstrian@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      9 hours ago

      The following paragraph from this Le Monde article seems to explain their reasoning:

      Zelensky’s changing stance on these memory issues comes as the Kremlin’s invasion of Ukraine in February 2022 has profoundly altered Ukrainians’ relationship with their history. The authorities are now working to create a national pantheon to honor multiple figures of Ukrainian nationalism spanning centuries. Zelensky thus finds himself in a delicate position, caught between the risk of not meeting the demands of a narrative centered on resisting Moscow and the international repercussions of such memory policies.

      • LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        9 hours ago

        Nationalism is poison. They may feel at the moment it’s less dangerous than the Russian invasion but I am not so sure.

  • Optional@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    14 hours ago

    I don’t like it at all.

    • Séimhe (sé / é)@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      14 hours ago

      I’ve read a short article about it but it seems that without relevant historical knowledge it’s hard to determine. My initial impression is that the Polish president is purposely making a spectacle of the issue and rage baiting his population, and that the main beneficiary is Putin.

      • someguy3@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Tensions between Warsaw and Kyiv have been high for days following Zelensky’s decision to name a military unit after the Ukrainian Insurgent Army (UPA), a World War II militia that Warsaw accuses of participating in massacres of Poles.

        That’s better context.

      • Jessicat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        13 hours ago

        Thank you for a little background. The story keeps going through the news cycle and I was unclear on what the fundamental problem was.