no, but considering the types of females that have no hair down there tend to be prepubecent (or have alopecia,) or the women who are concerned about early detection of STI’s, it does imply a kind of coding about the men who prefer it, rather than having no preference.
It’s supported farther down as a indicator that the man sees women as equating to children, or sees the woman as permiscuous. I promise you that in either case, i’m calling out mysogyny.
It’s literally the subject of the thread. taps title also, how would you describe a non adult person with two x chromosomes? There’s no such thing as a prepubescent “woman.” That’s an oxymoron.
no, but considering the types of females that have no hair down there tend to be prepubecent (or have alopecia,) or the women who are concerned about early detection of STI’s, it does imply a kind of coding about the men who prefer it, rather than having no preference.
Females and men.
I was about to agree with you but I reread it. Women is used as well, and the sentence that uses females is about their biology not choice.
Still not accepting the argument about the implication on men’s coding though.
It’s supported farther down as a indicator that the man sees women as equating to children, or sees the woman as permiscuous. I promise you that in either case, i’m calling out mysogyny.
There was no need to use “females” at all in that sentence structure.
It’s literally the subject of the thread. taps title also, how would you describe a non adult person with two x chromosomes? There’s no such thing as a prepubescent “woman.” That’s an oxymoron.