• JoShmoe@ani.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 小时前

    I blame the competitive gamers that barely understand what theyre doing. I seen guys complaining about their frame rates dropping below 120 on a 2k display.

    Maybe, something higher than 120 provides an advantage to players with extreme reactive skills in the most intense close quarter first-person combat, but there otherwise wouldnt be a reason to sustain anything above 120. I dont think there are any monitors that refresh above 120.

    Imagine bottlenecking 200+ frames a second, at 2k resolution, through a 60 hertz monitor. What a waste of gpu.

    • umfk@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 小时前

      I dont think there are any monitors that refresh above 120.

      I’m sorry what are you talking about? I have a 240Hz monitor and you can easily buy one with over 500Hz. And 240 feels so much smoother than 120, even in story heavy games.

      • JoShmoe@ani.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        38 分钟前

        I see. I hope you’ve optimized your gpu, otherwise you could be burning out that thing for no good reason. The science behind how much visual information the brain can process is ongoing. I guess the consensus is that humans can process as much as 200 frames a second with some suggesting that a person could reach 1000 frames a second. That last one sounds ridiculous to me.