ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 2 days agoMeet Potential Languagelemmy.worldimagemessage-square33fedilinkarrow-up1204
arrow-up1204imageMeet Potential Languagelemmy.worldZILtoid1991@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 2 days agomessage-square33fedilink
minus-squareZILtoid1991@lemmy.worldOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up13·2 days agoIf nothing else, there’s also OpenD, which might be better for you based on your requirements.
minus-squareValmond@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up12·2 days ago3 Ds? That’s too many! Let’s make a new D that encompasses them all! /j
minus-squareZILtoid1991@lemmy.worldOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up6·2 days agoThere’s now 4 competing standards. TBH, the compiler issue mostly resolved, only thing that is still problematic is module constructor order between DMD and LDC.
If nothing else, there’s also OpenD, which might be better for you based on your requirements.
3 Ds? That’s too many! Let’s make a new D that encompasses them all!
/j
There’s now 4 competing standards.
TBH, the compiler issue mostly resolved, only thing that is still problematic is module constructor order between DMD and LDC.