ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 23 days agoMeet Potential Languagelemmy.worldimagemessage-square37fedilinkarrow-up1213
arrow-up1213imageMeet Potential Languagelemmy.worldZILtoid1991@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 23 days agomessage-square37fedilink
minus-squareZILtoid1991@lemmy.worldOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up13·23 days agoIf nothing else, there’s also OpenD, which might be better for you based on your requirements.
minus-squareValmond@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up13·22 days ago3 Ds? That’s too many! Let’s make a new D that encompasses them all! /j
minus-squareValmond@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·2 days agoEEE Oh no that’s a Microsoft strategy
minus-squareZILtoid1991@lemmy.worldOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up6·22 days agoThere’s now 4 competing standards. TBH, the compiler issue mostly resolved, only thing that is still problematic is module constructor order between DMD and LDC.
If nothing else, there’s also OpenD, which might be better for you based on your requirements.
3 Ds? That’s too many! Let’s make a new D that encompasses them all!
/j
D+++
EEE
Oh no that’s a Microsoft strategy
There’s now 4 competing standards.
TBH, the compiler issue mostly resolved, only thing that is still problematic is module constructor order between DMD and LDC.