• Regrettable_incident@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    10 hours ago

    This is true, but there’s also a real lack of small pickups on the market. The fuckers just seem to be getting bigger and bigger. I used to have a Proton Jumbuck and it was really useful. Used it a lot for hauling wood and soil, it was small enough to get around and park easily in the city. I got rid of it eventually because it was so hard to find parts, shame, it was a handy little machine.

    • BigJohnnyHines@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      8 hours ago

      It’s super frustrating because if you talk to anyone in a blue collar or rural area they all tell you they wish they still made small trucks. The manufacturers keep upping the size and cost adding shit nobody even asked for.

      • TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        4 hours ago

        the Ford Maverick has been on the market for 5 years now.

        The F150 sold 150K units, the F-series sold 830K units, last year.

        Folks overwhelmingly choose larger cars even when smaller options are available.

        • aeiou_ckr@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 hour ago

          A front wheel drive unibody “truck” is a slap in the face to the small trucks of old. A dent in the bed and you either total it or replace a rear tire ever 6 months do to unfixable alignment issues.

          • TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 hour ago

            right, so you buy a f150 instead and bitch there are no small trucks.

            lose lose

            you can go buy a used small body on frame truck. just expect to pay 30-40K for one, because they are highly desirable.

            • aeiou_ckr@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              56 minutes ago

              You’re right it’s a lose lose. Personally I’m in the camp of not wasting money on a poorly thought out truck (maverick) and just go rent one for the 1 time in 5 years I’ll need a bed. I had a big truck that was just enough to tow my RV (lived full time to save money for a home) and now that I don’t live in an RV full time that bitch was sold. Hello New world of tiny EV. :)

        • BigJohnnyHines@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Whether rightly or wrongly, without a body on frame construction they were never really trying to sell that to traditional truck consumers.

      • bobs_monkey@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 hours ago

        The increased size is to flout emissions regulations. Costs (aside from greed) is due to increased requirements from the NHTSA.