• FishFace@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    10 hours ago

    This is irrelevant for work, where you need a web browser and work applications (which are probably more web browsers). My work laptop is currently sitting on 33G used out of 64G.

    • OhneHose@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Yeah and if you’d use Linux your work laptop would be sitting at like 6gb, if you’d just browse the web and edit text documents.

      The only time I ever need more than 10 gigs on my main machine is when I play games. Windows and Linux aren’t even close in normal use cases.

      You can even try it yourself, grab yourself a 10 year old laptop and install any Linux distro on it, it will feel like a new machine.

      • FishFace@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Yeah and if you’d use Linux your work laptop

        which I do so maybe remove your head from wherever it’s stuck and rethink.

        Memory use of applications is not especially different between operating systems (assuming no compression). The hand the OS has in memory usage is mainly its own memory usage, but that is dwarfed by application usage. In the case of an application like, say, Firefox, its core is written in languages like C++ with explicit memory management. The same code runs on both platforms, so when you open a webpage, the same data structures are needed in the same quantities. CPU architecture can change how much memory a structure needs, but OS doesn’t. So the application requests essentially the same number of bytes from the operating system, and the OS reserves that many bytes for the use of the application.

        You can get into more detail than this, resulting in some small differences, but given that you started with a hilariously wrong assumption I don’t think there’s any need.