• MangoCats@feddit.it
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 hours ago

    It comes down to risk-reward. If the risk is low enough, they take it - assuming the additional reward outweighs the consequences.

    When your decision makers can just declare corporate bankruptcy when the risk finally happens, with no personal exposure other than loss of future income? You can bet they’ll take that risk every time.

    • tty5@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      The neck of the finance woods my employer is in is highly regulated.

      Just failing to notify a regulator on time you blocked a transaction attempt involving a sanctioned individual means hundreds of thousands in fines per transaction (not up to, flat 6-digit fine) + potential prison time (can’t remember if it was up to 15 or 20 years)