cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/48700597

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/48700080

Monday, June 29 could become a defining day for online privacy in Europe.

The EU’s final trilogue on Chat Control 2.0 could decide the future of one of the bloc’s most controversial surveillance proposals. Critics warn it could pave the way for mandatory message scanning, encryption backdoors, and unprecedented access to private communications and potentially affecting apps like WhatsApp, Signal, and Telegram.

The decision won’t just impact Europe. It could shape the future of encrypted messaging and digital privacy worldwide.

  • Muscle_Meteor@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 days ago

    What does signal leaving europe mean? That i cant install it and recieve updates while in europe? Or that if it detects im in europe it wont function at all.

    Just thinking about sideloading or location spoofing

    • WaxRhetorical@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 days ago

      There are always workarounds.
      The issue is that most people will not go through these steps, so it just becomes the new normal. Everyone loses their privacy and the few that fight back are then labeled as contrarian and monitored/harassed. Wonderful world

    • floofloof@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      In Canada we’re facing the same question. Our government just hurried through Bill C-22 without debate, which grants the government access to encrypted communications (so, compromised encryption) and mandates retention of metadata. Signal has said it will leave Canada if this becomes law, as have some VPN companies.

      This is a worldwide coordinated attack on privacy and free speech, which is one reason why “I’ll just VPN to another country” isn’t a solution. And even if everyone finds technical workarounds and breaks the law together, it empowers governments to start enforcing the law selectively based on people’s politics. Anyone organizing an environmental protest, a queer rights movement or a left-wing party will soon experience such selective enforcement.