If you’ve been paying attention you’ll note that I’ve not made any assumptions about your personal beliefs. Merely addressing things you’ve actually said. Not making strawman.
Mother fucker, in your very first reply you told me I was speaking ill of migrants. In the very next paragraph of your current comment you’ll tell me I’m victim blaming, when I’ve repeatedly said we’re all humans in systems, and outlined why migrants do what they do.
You’re the one who wants to reward the system with a cheap, exploitable labour class.
Anyways I’ll let you get back to your “anyone I don’t like is racist and hates immigrants. It’s the fault of Unions who I support” (again, your views aren’t coherent).
Anarcho-syndiacalist - “Everyone but me should do more for me”
I’m betting you can’t name, and don’t do anything as part of a syndicate or organized collective. I’m betting you’re an in-name-only ideologue. Good for you, having values is important, maybe one day you’ll try applying them and you’ll see how they’re flawed by practical, on the ground, reality.
Ideology is a luxury meant to cause idiots to debate other idiots. I’m stupid for getting involved.
Because you were misrepresenting and speaking I’ll of them. That wasn’t an assumption.
You know nothing of my views, and I never said you were racist. But if you want to narc on yourself that’s your prerogative. These absurd strawman you keep creating to attack though just screams petty flailing incoherence and disingenuousness.
Mother fucker, in your very first reply you told me I was speaking ill of migrants. In the very next paragraph of your current comment you’ll tell me I’m victim blaming, when I’ve repeatedly said we’re all humans in systems, and outlined why migrants do what they do.
You’re the one who wants to reward the system with a cheap, exploitable labour class.
Anyways I’ll let you get back to your “anyone I don’t like is racist and hates immigrants. It’s the fault of Unions who I support” (again, your views aren’t coherent).
Anarcho-syndiacalist - “Everyone but me should do more for me”
I’m betting you can’t name, and don’t do anything as part of a syndicate or organized collective. I’m betting you’re an in-name-only ideologue. Good for you, having values is important, maybe one day you’ll try applying them and you’ll see how they’re flawed by practical, on the ground, reality.
Ideology is a luxury meant to cause idiots to debate other idiots. I’m stupid for getting involved.
Because you were misrepresenting and speaking I’ll of them. That wasn’t an assumption.
You know nothing of my views, and I never said you were racist. But if you want to narc on yourself that’s your prerogative. These absurd strawman you keep creating to attack though just screams petty flailing incoherence and disingenuousness.