Richard Dawkins himself has renounced the definition he set. Go read a book.
Plus he was always critizised for that definition by his peers, for example by Scott Atran showed through cognitive psychological studies that ideas do not regularly replicate by imitation and that ideas do not develope like genes.
And on top of that, Dawkins is a dickhead. And a dumb one falling into an AI psychosis.
Plus he was always critizised for that definition by his peers, for example by Scott Atran showed through cognitive psychological studies that ideas do not regularly replicate by imitation and that ideas do not develope like genes.
And on top of that, Dawkins is a dickhead. And a dumb one falling into an AI psychosis.