So I posted an article from al Arabiya about Christian villages denying that they asked Netanyahu to annex their villages on World News@lemmy.world.
Jordanlund removed it simply because he don’t like the source. Yet he has no problem with articles from Saudi backed Iranian media https://irannewswire.org/ that also celebrate the terrorist group the MEK that sell out their country to side with Saddam and has no problem with israeli sources that deny the obvious genocide.
yeahhh he is like that. he has been featured in this place quite a few times and still mods a lot of instances.
large ego mixed with a small amount of power. you know how it be.
The key is immature users with issues cannot stand being told “No”.
The community has clear, specific rules. When posts break the rules, they get removed. Some people handle it well, make corrections, and become valued members of the community…
And then there are others…
The community has vague rules . You neither have a list of banned website and no mention of fact checkers either
From the sidebar:
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed.
Also from the sidebar:
Recommendations
How to spot Misinformation and Propaganda
For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/
Consider including the article’s mediabiasfactcheck.com/ link
As noted above:
alarabiya.net
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/al-arabiya/
“Overall, we rate Al Arabiya as Questionable due to excessive government censorship that results in the publication of pro-state propaganda. We also rate them Mixed for factual reporting due to the omission of key facts in stories. (8/16/2016) Updated (M. Huitsing 10/06/2023)”
thenationalnews.com
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/the-national-uae/
“Overall, we rate The National Questionable based on poor sourcing, promotion of state propaganda, lack of transparency, and censorship. (8/29/2016) Updated (M. Huitsing 06/06/2025)”
Your sidebar has zero mention on how it is determined. Bbc was exposed for policing palestinians voices making them questionable. Timeofisrael deny genocide making them questionable. Unlike you , i have a brain to make my own judgement rather than relying on a random fact check site with no real autority
Sidebar:
"Recommendations
How to spot Misinformation and Propaganda
For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/
Consider including the article’s mediabiasfactcheck.com/ link"