So I posted an article from al Arabiya about Christian villages denying that they asked Netanyahu to annex their villages on World News@lemmy.world.
Jordanlund removed it simply because he don’t like the source. Yet he has no problem with articles from Saudi backed Iranian media https://irannewswire.org/ that also celebrate the terrorist group the MEK that sell out their country to side with Saddam and has no problem with israeli sources that deny the obvious genocide.
Because, again, you’re trying to lie your way in to being allowed to use inherently invalid sources.
Think of it like this:
You find a REALLY juicy story and you REALLY want to post it… But the only source is The New York Post.
Are you going to post it anyway and then argue like a little bitch when it gets removed?
Or, OR would you rather go “Hmm… Seems too good to be true, lets see who else is covering this…” and submit that instead.
Particularly when a mod tells you “No, not that source, try again.”
The story carries way more weight coming from a legitimate source than a fantasy source and if the goal is to get the story noticed and accepted, which should be what EVERYONE wants, you, me, and everyone else in the community.
You do not want the reaction of “Yeah, but it’s a bullshit site.”
You would rather force your agenda, have it get removed when it breaks the rules of the community, and then argue over simply finding a better source.
Because finding a better source doesn’t fit your agenda. 😉