RmDebArc_5@piefed.zip to Lefty Memes@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish · edit-22 months agoAnon is a centristmedia.piefed.zipimagemessage-square120fedilinkarrow-up1594
arrow-up1594imageAnon is a centristmedia.piefed.zipRmDebArc_5@piefed.zip to Lefty Memes@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish · edit-22 months agomessage-square120fedilink
minus-squareNonconfrontational@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·1 month agoNot really, as we can dramatically increase iq with wealth.
minus-squarechortle_tortle@mander.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·1 month agoThese are not mutually exclusive statements. For example I exfoliate with nickles because money reduces dumb dumb.
minus-squarenanometer1625@thelemmy.clublinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 month agoIf true, then it would provide a way to redistribute wealth and measure the collective impact on IQ in a quantitative way, which would indeed make it a useful statistic
minus-squareNonconfrontational@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 month agoLet me know when we do wealth redistribution, lol.
Not really, as we can dramatically increase iq with wealth.
These are not mutually exclusive statements.
For example I exfoliate with nickles because money reduces dumb dumb.
If true, then it would provide a way to redistribute wealth and measure the collective impact on IQ in a quantitative way, which would indeed make it a useful statistic
Let me know when we do wealth redistribution, lol.