Argentina’s 3-2 win over Egypt in the World Cup round of 16 has triggered controversy on and off the pitch, after Egypt’s players, coaching staff and supporters questioned several key decisions in the match.

Egypt had led 2-0 and appeared on course for a place in the quarter-finals before conceding three late goals. But the result was quickly overshadowed by anger over the officiating, including an Egypt goal ruled out after a review, late penalty appeals that were waved away, and protests from the Egyptian bench before Argentina’s stoppage-time winner.

The anger was also visible on the touchline, where members of Egypt’s coaching staff protested against the decisions, while players were seen arguing with officials.

Online, many said the calls had denied Egypt a fair chance to advance, turning the match into one of the most debated games of the knockout stage.

Egypt coach Hossam Hassan criticised the officiating after the match, saying Egypt had been the better side and that what happened was “not fair”. He questioned why Egypt’s goal was ruled out, saying the team could have gone 3-1 ahead before the score became 2-2, and suggested there was “marketing” support for the previous World Cup champions to remain in the tournament.