The term Tankie has a clear definition that Cowbee likes to ignore:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tankie

Tankie is a pejorative label generally applied to authoritarian communists, especially those who support or defend acts of repression by such regimes, their allies, or deny the occurrence of the events thereof.

Join the lemmy.ml boycott today and help foster a better Lemmy-verse! No more posts, comments (except to counter their propaganda ofc!) or upvotes on any comms on the Lemmy.ml instance! To make this easy you can do an instance block at Settings > Block Tab > Scroll to bottom > Input “lemmy.ml” and apply

And consider donating to individual instances instead.

Check the megathread for more!

  • LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    2 hours ago

    I find it very hard to believe, given CowBee’s constant proselytizing, that they do not understand the distinction being made here.

    • Eldritch@piefed.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 hours ago

      I guarantee you they 100% understand. They simply don’t care and are just being dishonest. They believe the ends justify the means.

        • OwOarchist@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          10 minutes ago

          Or being paid by parties in the US who want to make “Communism” look bad.

          I think that’s the real source for a lot of tankie bullshit.

  • Beacon@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    20 minutes ago

    All tankies are communists (purportedly), but not all communists are tankies. Tankies believe in Stalin-style militant communism, and will do or say anything to support their ends regardless of if it’s objectively true or not. They will deny all harms that are caused by anyone who claims to be a communist.

    Basically they’re MAGA in a different claimed direction.

  • Broadfern@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    2 hours ago

    Wait…pretty sure contemporary Russia is CINO and even then just barely as they’ve gone capitalist in the ‘90s. I could understand the pedantics if it was expressly the USSR (Don’t agree with it, as an anarchist obvs, but still) or “critical support” for China, but here-and-now Russia?

    • Eldritch@piefed.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Always has been 🌍👨‍🚀🔫🧑‍🚀

      Communism is classless and stateless. Somehow I find it hard to believe when the political class from a given state says they’re communist.

  • AlteE@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Sadly, but ml instance has also communities that are focused on non-political themes like tech stuff, so for now it has sense to block each community on ml except the normal ones.

      • AlteE@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 hours ago

        Okay, taking into account that many people here are longer than me and are actually seem to be solid right, why instances then don’t simply defederate themselves from ml? Like they have done it with hexbear instance?

        • cm0002@infosec.pubOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          17 minutes ago

          A few have, but it’s been brought up before

          Some don’t want to because it’s a “flagship” instance and ther fore has many old comms on it (But on that note, it’s only by subscriber count, which never goes down unless a user actually unsubscribes from a comm, so .ml memes might have 50k subscribers, but the absolute vast majority of that is gonna be dead, deleted and maybe even alt accounts, if we go by Monthly Active User metrics like off of lemmyverse.net you’ll see that very very few .ml comms still beat their non-ml equivalent.)

          Some don’t because of fear of retribution from dessalines or at the very least “slow walking” of any issues that might come up, not likely to happen with smaller instances. But if you’re as big as say .world, then that could be a potentially huge problem and would be the exact kind of instance dessalines would choose to flex this retribution on as a message.

          Some don’t because they prefer to have their users decide for themselves (e.g. dbzer0.com) or have an alternative such as lemmy.zip’s default block which block the whole triad for new users. Which is fair, there should be instances on the Threadiverse that are unfiltered for uh “Politically thick skinned users” but they should not be put forth to prospective users from Threadiverse advocates looking to bring users from reddit.

          And then there are some that do, infosec.pub and Lemmy.cafe are the 2 that come to mind, but I’m sure there are more

        • UntimedDiffusion@piefed.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 hour ago

          The Lemmy developers created .ml making it the “flagship” instance and giving it a high user count unrelated to it’s politics. I’ve also seen some people express fear of some sort of retribution if they defederate from ml, but I personally think that’s a bit overblown

          • kibblebits@quokk.au
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            1 hour ago

            Oh the retribution is real. ML are disgraceful humans. But they’ve got accounts on every instance, so the only thing an ml defed would accomplish is fragmentation.