• WesternInfidels@feddit.online
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Your assertion baffles me. The CC client is sending information about its execution context back to Anthropic HQ in a sneaky, obfuscated way that most people wouldn’t notice.

      If that’s not a hidden message, if that’s not steganography, what is?

    • billwashere@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Yeah I thought steganography was hiding messages in images.

      Ok I just looked it up, apparently it can be anything. Images, audio, video, or even text.

      I remember I had this Perl module once that would convert passwords into a binary string and then convert that string into spaces and tabs. Looked like a blank file. I guess that was technically steganography.

      • frongt@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        4 hours ago

        No, that’s encoding. If you hid that message inside another message, that would be steganography.

        • wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 hours ago

          It is a message hidden in a message. The hidden message is the binary password, and the container message is “[blank]