• Eldritch@piefed.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Sadly no. Most browsers don’t render static JXL by default yet. Let alone animated. I wish they would. Though for most things regular video transport streams will usually be as good or better. Honestly at this point animated image formats really are kind of a niche and not necessarily super useful at this point. Apng for instance when it was created nearly 20 years ago made some sense. Today now that it’s finally getting supported it doesn’t make as much sense.

    • Victor@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      I mean, we don’t really need a browser to render it in order to make a performance comparison. But hey, Firefox is getting support for JPEG XL? So there’s that, I guess.

            • Victor@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 hours ago

              That’s what I meant by “behind a switch” 😅, sorry if that was unclear.

              • Eldritch@piefed.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                6 hours ago

                No you’re fine. I just wanted to be clear that until it’s default it may as well not be there. Outside of my own personal pet projects. No one else would see them that visited unless it was enabled by default generally and therefore not very useful still. I don’t know how much longer it will take them to enable it by default. I hope not much longer. I generally like jxl.