Cross posted from https://piefed.social/c/privacy@lemmy.world/p/2212799/you-know-about-flock-cameras-meet-nema-nodes-they-turn-streetlights-into-a-surveillance

Standardized NEMA sockets let municipalities add cameras and air sensors to existing poles with no public vote or new hardware

      • Crozekiel@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        11 hours ago

        You can’t control if you are in a place where wifi is turned on… The “wifi radar” doesn’t need you to have a device with wifi on to “see” you - it “sees” YOU in the physical world. Your body blocking the signal.

        Also, on the actual OP subject, a Nema Node is basically just a specific power socket… Wild that they can basically just install extra power outlets all over the city and then later go plug in an AI face tracker 5000 to every one of them with no further oversight just because “the outlet was already there”…

          • Crozekiel@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            11 hours ago

            It seems to me more that they are stating the way the regulations are written, if they install the outlets now, they don’t have to get anyone’s permission to install the surveillance later. Which is wild if true.

            • BloodMuffin@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              10 hours ago

              you obviously don’t understand the basics of this topic

              the outlets aren’t be replaced, it’s what is plugged into them.

        • BloodMuffin@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          12 hours ago

          i turn off my WiFi everytime I leave home. this prevents my phone from broadcasting my saved WiFi networks. therefore public WiFis can not identify me via that list.

          can you explain to be why that isn’t a viable option?

          • Crozekiel@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            11 hours ago

            Unless we are talking about a different “wifi radar” here, it doesn’t need you to have wifi on your person to track you, the radio waves being emitted by the wifi device (like a router) are being tracked and they can tell where you are and where you are going based on the interference your meat creates. If they have a “wifi radar” on every street light in your city, they could just literally “watch” you from the moment you leave your house. You could be completely tech naked and wearing a full body suit and a mask, but at some point you still had to leave your house, and chances are they can figure out who lives at that address.