Whelp. So I actually had the most interesting discussion I’ve had on ML. Generally, I ignore the nasty comments there and only respond to those who are actually trying to have a somewhat decent discussion. They’re few and far between, but they exist. Which ended up happening - I had an extended discussion with Cowbee on what a dictatorship is and what democracy is. While IMO there were pretty huge gaps in his arguments, I have to respect that he actually engaged in the discussion without the usual name-calling, putdowns and insults I’m used to on that corner of the fediverse (yes, it’s a low bar, but credit where credit is due). And I’ll be honest, it was a fascinating window into the world view of people who think like that. Call me crazy, but I actually learned something.

At some point, the discussion started going in circles, and I figured there’s no point continuing, since as far as I could tell, everything relevant had already been said, and he didn’t exactly seem to have anything new to add, either - so I stopped responding. (To be fair, I stopped responding once before because life got in the way, but the discussion resumed after I noticed that the thread was actually still alive for whatever reason.) This morning, I wake up - banned for 6 days. Reason: imperialist. The discussion had next to nothing to do with imperialism. It’s like whoever it is who banned me didn’t even bother trying to give a proper explanation. Meanwhile comments like

That’s literally exactly what that means you fucking moron

didn’t get a ban, even though they’re in blatant violation of rule 1:

Be civil and nice.

Interestingly enough, my comments are all still up. I’ve tried to archive it (unfortunately neither archive.org nor archive.is worked) because I actually genuinely found the discussion interesting, even if Cowbee’s arguments ended up reinforcing my own opinion more than I thought it would.

Weird place, ML.

EDIT: I checked lemmy.ml’s modlog and interestingly enough, my ban isn’t listed there, even though I’m very clearly banned from the community. Not sure what’s going on there (or if I’m maybe misunderstanding how this works)

  • Atomic@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    I remember having this “discussion” with someone on ML. I ended up pulling the actual digital document, in Ukrainian. Where it literally says, Elections are not to be held during martial law. (https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/389-19 if someone is interested)

    Now I’m gonna give you some options, and you can play a game of guess what they did.

    a) Concede that they were wrong, and that Zelensky did in fact not cancel elections to remain in power.

    b) Declare the digital copy of the documents coming off an official Ukrainian website are doctored.

    c) Admit I am correct but that it has been edited since after the Invasion started, courtesy of “Zelensky the Dictator”

    d) Say that despite the law, Zelensky could, if he wanted to, hold elections, he just don’t want to.

    correct answer

    C

    • deft@lemmy.wtf
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 days ago

      Lol I’m gonna go with B because that sounds about right for their userbase