• bignose@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Not just you. For more than a quarter century, we’ve known that if a paragraph’s text lines sprawl across a wide screen, it’s more difficult for most people to read. (And the same is true if the lines are too short. There’s an optimal range.)

      https://jamesmattison.co.uk/method/why-line-length-matters-for-legibility/

      For this reason, it’s good for a website’s style rules to limit how wide (measured in characters) a column of text can get, regardless of how much screen there is to expand into.

    • zerofk@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      3 days ago

      On desktop you can change window sizes to what you want. Don’t like wide text? Use part of the screen. But the inverse is not true: if a site decides to stay skinny you can’t make it wide if that’s what you prefer.

    • jaybone@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      3 days ago

      This is why I miss square screens. And I miss proper UI/UX design which makes good use of screen real estate.

      • EmilieEasie@fedinsfw.app
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        3 days ago

        Omg, same, so same. But putting anything I need to read (like… anything in a browser usually) in a smaller window is fine. Librewolf letterboxing kinda does it for me.

    • chunes@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      If you don’t want to change the window size for whatever reason, I find that reader mode (F9) solves this problem pretty well.